March 22, 2007

Are All Georgia Personal Injury Lawyers Created Equal? Litigator or Trial Lawyer?

Litigation: 
n. any lawsuit or other resort to the courts to determine a legal question or matter.

Litigator:
n.  one who litigates

Trying cases and litigating a case are, in my opinion, two totally different animals.

To some, the term litigator has a certain appeal, even an allure.  To others, the term is synonymous with alligator.  However you chose to interpret the term, make no mistake about it:  there is a difference between litigators and trial lawyers.  For the attorneys reading this article, it really is more than semantics or a difference in terms. 

Continue reading "Are All Georgia Personal Injury Lawyers Created Equal? Litigator or Trial Lawyer?" »

March 22, 2007

Workers' Compensation Case Law Update - Burns Int'l Sec. Servs. Corp. v. Johnson

On March 19, 2007, the Georgia Court of Appeals decided this case.  The underlying facts of this case are tragic.  Ms. Johnson was employed as a night security guard.  She was murdered one night while assigned to guard a vacant and historically dangerous property.  Her family brought an action against her employer Burns Security for wrongful death.

The Court of Appeals held that Ms. Johnson's family's rights were limited by Georgia Workers' Compensation Law.  Specifically, the Exclusive Remedy Provision contained at O.C.G.A. 34-9-11 generally prohibits injured workers from bringing civil lawsuits against their employers.  In this case, the Court held that Ms. Johnson's family was limited to workers' compensation benefits and could not bring a lawsuit against her employer. 

It is important to note that there are several exceptions to this general rule.  An attorney should be consulted when this situation arises as soon as possible. 

March 5, 2007

Dealing With Medical Bills And Health Insurance After A Car Accident: Stand Up Straight & Stop "Liening"

    The subject of liens causes concern in most lawyers handling injury cases.  When I say the term lien in auto accident and personal injury cases, I refer to the interest a third-party has in recouping money it paid for medical services.  This usually happens when a health insurance company or governmental entity pays medical bills.  Liens can also arise when medical providers perform medical services and are not paid by the patient/client or their insurance.  The term "lien" can also include terms such as subrogation and workers' compensation reimbursement.  Admittedly, this is a complicated subject that could be the subject of a full treatise. 
    I have a simple rule of thumb: it is better to address liens and subrogation interests head-on instead of ignoring the issue.  In years past many lawyers, many very good lawyers in fact, routinely ignored repayment issues.  Recently, however, the legal landscape has changed significantly.  Here is a short list of some of different types of liens and subrogation interests that lawyers handing personal injury claims are likely to encounter:

Continue reading "Dealing With Medical Bills And Health Insurance After A Car Accident: Stand Up Straight & Stop "Liening"" »

March 5, 2007

New Case Update - Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Parker

    On February 22, 2007, the Court of Appeals decided yet another workers' compensation case. This case involved an oversight by a judge wherein an Order was not sent to the parties.  The employer, who wanted to appeal the case, was unable to do so because they never received a copy of the Order.  The Court of Appeals ordered the Superior Court to re-enter its judgment so the Employer and Insurer will have 30 days to file an appeal.
    This case gave a break to the Employer.  While it can be viewed as beneficial to the Employer, the tables could have easily been turned on the injured worker.  The importance of this case should not be overlooked as parties now have a case to rely upon if they fail to read and follow the law closely. O.C.G.A. 34-9-105 states that if the Superior Court does not issue an Order within a specified time, the Award from Georgia's State Board of Workers' Compensation will be affirmed. This is precisely what happened in this case.  Nevertheless, once the Superior Court issues its Order, it admittedly failed to send it to the Employer and Insurer. This was the basis for Wal-Mart's successful appeal.

March 5, 2007

Workers' Compensation Case Law Update - Caremore, Inc./Wooddale Nursing Home v. Hollis

    Late February was a busy time for workers' compensation cases from the Georgia Court of Appeals.  On February 22, 2007, the Court issued its opinion in Caremore, Inc./Wooddale Nursing Home v. Hollis. This case dealt with what I think is an important issue: O.C.G.A. 34-9-205.  I will write separately about the pre-approval problems in workers' compensation cases.  This case addressed the employer and insurer's willfulness in failing to comply with the form filing rules under Georgia workers' compensation law.  It held that the circumstances warranted a finding of a violation of Board Rule 61.
    Another central issue involved the injured worker's meals.  The Court held that the meals provided by the employer and insurer increased the average weekly wage, thus entitling the injured worker to additional weekly benefits. 
    As previously discussed, the issue of pre-authorization creates many problems in workers' compensation cases.  My office very often deals with medical providers who, understandably, do not want to perform services without pre-authorization from the workers' compensation insurance company.  The problem is that currently pre-authorization is not required for medical services provided by the Authorized Treating Physician or another physician to whom the ATP refers an injured worker.  The Form WC-205 is there the rubber meets the road to address this issue.  If a Form WC-205 is sent by a medical provider to an employer and insurer, a response is required or the treatment stands pre-approved.  In my practice, I make it a point to help medical providers understand the law.  Often, we send WC-205's partially completed to the medical provider(s) so all they will have to complete is the pertinent medical information, sign, and send it to the insurer.  When insurers drag their feet on getting medical treatment approved, this can be helpful

March 5, 2007

Case Law Update - Reliance Electric Co. v. Brightwell

    On February 19, 2007, the Court of Appeals issued its decision in this case.  This case dealt with an insurer's failure to timely file a form WC-2 before suspending benefits.  Under Georgia Workers' Compensation law, an insurance company is required to file a Form WC-2 before suspending an injured workers' weekly income benefits.  There is an additional added protection built into the law which requires 10 days' notice to those suffering an on the job work injury.  In this case, the  WC-2 was filed with the Georgia State Board of Workers' Compensation less than 10 days prior to stopping weekly benefits.  The Claimant argued that the WC-2 was ineffective and was eventually awarded an additional 17 month's of income benefits.
       The Court of Appeals thought otherwise and held that the WC-2 was not invalidated altogether.  The Claimant got an additional 4 days of benefits, not 17 months of additional workers' compensation benefits.  Interestingly, the Court of Appeals also remanded the case for consideration of attorneys' fees.  It seems as if the Court of Appeals thought that this would be a good case for assessed attorneys' fees even though the Administrative Law Judge did not think they were appropriate.
    This case helps to solidify the requirement that an employer and insurance company must file a WC-2 prior to suspending income benefits.  There have been a long line of cases supporting this notion.  I recommend that attorneys dealing with this issue be sure to check the details about the WC-2, including whether and when it was filed with the Georgia State Board of Workers' Compensation.